Opinion
By Larkos Larkou
On January 15, 2026, President Nikos Christodoulides said that “a huge effort is underway, and by the end of 2025 we will have completed everything, with the aim that in 2026 the Republic of Cyprus will join the Schengen Area.”
But just a few months later, on May 21, he revised that timeline, stating that “significant progress has been made on Cyprus’ accession to the Schengen Area, and a political decision is expected at the end of 2026 or early 2027, an important milestone for Cyprus” (CNA, 21/5).
The shifting dates reflect a process that is still very much ongoing.
On May 18, the European Commission published its fifth “State of Schengen” report, setting priorities for the 2026–2027 period. Within that framework, it notes that “in December 2025, an assessment was carried out on Cyprus’ level of readiness for full accession to the Schengen Area.”
The report adds that “during 2025, substantial progress was recorded, with Cypriot authorities implementing significant reforms in line with Schengen standards.”
Among the commission's priorities are Cyprus’ completion of accession work, full implementation of internal security rules, closer cooperation with enlargement countries, further digitalization of border procedures through the Entry/Exit System (EES), preparations for the new ETIAS system, and strengthening return mechanisms with the support of Frontex.
The Schengen Agreement itself forms part of the EU’s internal security architecture and falls under the remit of national interior and justice.
A process still in motion
While the European Commission plays a key role, final approval depends on a political decision by all 29 Schengen member states, requiring unanimity.
So far, no objections from member states regarding Cyprus have been made public.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is said to be supportive of Cyprus’ accession.
But the final step is political: national parliaments of the Schengen states will ultimately vote on whether to approve Cyprus’ entry.
The Ireland question and the border issue
Ireland’s position is often cited as an example of the complexity involved.
Schengen membership effectively means participation in a system with external borders and checks similar to airport border controls.
To avoid turning the Irish border into a “hard border,” Dublin has opted for special arrangements rather than full participation.
The argument raised is that if Ireland approaches the issue with caution due to its unique circumstances, Cyprus has even stronger reasons to think carefully before following a standard model.
The core concern is the unresolved Cyprus problem.
Full accession to Schengen without a settlement, critics argue, would effectively turn the Green Line into a formal external border, normalising a de facto division that has been managed through the Green Line Regulation and crossing points.
Additional complications arise from the presence of two crossing points under British control at Pergamos and Strovilia, which would remain under a non-Schengen state’s regulatory framework.
Schengen as leverage in the Cyprus problem
Supporters of a more strategic approach argue that Schengen accession could be linked to progress in the Cyprus issue itself.
In this view, the EU could use Schengen as a positive incentive, offering a clear European benefit if progress is made on reunification efforts, provided all technical criteria are met.
They argue this could strengthen the overall political climate and give citizens a tangible sense of “European security” backed by legal commitments under the Schengen framework.
“Linkage diplomacy” as a political tool
More broadly, the argument extends to what some describe as “linkage diplomacy," connecting different elements of the EU–Cyprus–Turkey relationship.
This includes areas such as Eurozone participation, defense cooperation, search and rescue missions, potential Schengen membership, the EU–Turkey Customs Union, and the SAFE framework.
Proponents say such linkages could act as a meaningful political lever to help restart UN-led negotiations, with the EU playing a more active and constructive role.
The idea is not abstract appeals or declarations, but real political incentives rooted in practical interests.
In this framing, Schengen is not just an administrative upgrade. It is either a strict border regime in a divided island or a strategic bargaining tool in a much larger geopolitical negotiation.
