Newsroom
A well-known businessman has stepped forward to give testimony in an ongoing police investigation into Paphos Mayor Phaedon Phaedonos, shedding new light on complaints of alleged violence and other possible criminal offenses involving the mayor.
Authorities say the investigation was launched ex officio, meaning the police decided on their own that the available information was enough to start a formal inquiry. The review covers multiple complaints, including one related to the mayor’s wife and others that may involve potential criminal activity.
Police sources stressed that the way they are handling the case is the same as with any complaint coming from public sources or social media: all tips are evaluated, and if legal requirements are met, an investigation begins. Any public updates are limited by the stage of the investigation and by law.
When complaints involve police officers themselves, a separate authority, the Independent Authority for the Investigation of Allegations and Complaints against the Police, takes over, since the police cannot investigate themselves.
The Ministry of Interior has requested information from the police on what offenses are under investigation, because, under Cypriot law, certain convictions could affect the mayor’s ability to remain in office. So far, the Ministry says it has not received a response.
In his testimony, businessman Theodoros Aristodimou said he decided to speak out after years of silence to ensure “the truth finally shines” and that the public is fully informed. He also provided the police with names of people who may have first-hand knowledge of the case.
Police say investigations are ongoing and that any disclosure of details will follow legal requirements and procedural safeguards.
Recap: The investigation into Paphos Mayor Phaedon Phaedonos began after complaints suggested possible criminal behavior, including alleged violence against his wife. Businessman Theodoros Aristodimou has now testified, giving police names of people with firsthand knowledge. Authorities continue to review all information carefully, and decisions about charges or public disclosure are still pending.
