Christodoulides questions past policies, signals change for Cyprus

Last week, Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides gave a bold interview to ALPHA, where he criticized former President Makarios' policies. He opposed Cyprus aligning with the Non-Aligned Movement and mocked the prolonged struggle policy. Christodoulides argued that the biggest mistake was failing to cherish the Republic of Cyprus and declared his readiness to take significant steps toward solving the Cyprus problem.

The interview sparked extensive discussion within political circles, especially as critical developments are expected in September. Questions arose about whether his statements were a tactic to deflect responsibility, a signal for a two-state solution, or the start of a new political approach by Christodoulides, positioning himself as a pivotal figure in the nation's history.

Christodoulides' commitment to difficult decisions coincides with expected developments this autumn. Diplomatic sources indicate a trilateral meeting with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the two Cypriot leaders at the end of August, ahead of the UN General Assembly in New York. The meeting will focus on guarantees, troop withdrawal, and governance, with a specific timeframe and a break from traditional discussions.

Within the government, there is concern about a repeat of the uncertain situation of 2004. The Greek Cypriot side's worries are compounded by the Turkish side's demand for sovereign equality and international calls for innovative thinking. UN and other actors have urged moving away from past solutions that failed to meet expectations. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis highlighted the principles of one sovereignty, one international personality, and one citizenship during his visit to Cyprus, aligning with UN guarantees.

Despite talk of significant developments, there are internal concerns about Christodoulides' readiness for decisive action. Some view his statements as part of a communication strategy rather than a genuine change in policy. The timing of his statements coincided with domestic debates on past negotiations, raising suspicions of tactical maneuvering.

Christodoulides' approach relies partly on Turkish Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar's stance on a two-state solution, potentially absolving Cyprus from responsibility for a failed outcome. This strategy, reminiscent of Tassos Papadopoulos' era, could trap Christodoulides in unexpected developments. Government sources emphasize the need for concrete actions, such as opening checkpoints, to break the deadlock.

Christodoulides faces challenges with minimal domestic support. Strained relationships with coalition parties and recent elections have weakened his position. Internal party dynamics suggest potential exits from the government if bold steps are pursued. However, the two major parties may ultimately support the process in critical moments. The stance of the left-wing party AKEL remains uncertain, given its view of Christodoulides as part of the problem.

The coming months will pressure Christodoulides to make decisive moves on the Cyprus issue, balancing potential political costs and the risk of partition.

[Summary of Marina Economidou's original story in Greek published in Kathimerini's Cyprus edition]