Newsroom
The Supreme Judicial Council continues to hear Attorney General George Savvidis' request to suspend Auditor General Odysseus Michaelides on grounds of misconduct. The hearing has seen intense exchanges and notable testimonies, reflecting deep-seated tensions and complex legal arguments.
Yesterday, the cross-examination of Michaelides began but was abruptly paused by Council President Antonis Liatsos. Liatsos adjourned the session to consider an objection filed by Savvidis regarding Michaelides’ testimony about a pending complaint with the Anti-Corruption Authority. The day also featured testimony from Freddy Yves Ndjemba, a representative of INTOSAI, the international organization of supreme audit institutions, supporting Michaelides’ defense.
The session included heated exchanges between the parties. Attorney General's Counsel Dinos Kallis questioned Michaelides about his involvement with a controversial Facebook page, alleging that he tolerated threats made on it. Michaelides denied involvement with the page, asserting he had no control over how his image was used and had repeatedly stated his detachment from it. Kallis suggested that Michaelides had used his position to influence public opinion and maintain popularity, citing his involvement with support groups and media. Michaelides categorically denied these claims, emphasizing his independence and integrity. He recounted past good relations with former ministers, strained only by the gold passports issue.
Kallis brought up Michaelides’ condemnation of online insults, suggesting it could be seen as interference with free speech. Michaelides defended his actions, explaining his role in ensuring ethical conduct without infringing on free expression. Kallis also accused Michaelides of undermining the Attorney General by reporting to the Anti-Corruption Authority about the handling of double pensions and gold passports. Michaelides rejected the accusations, clarifying his intent was to uphold the rule of law, not to accuse individuals of corruption.
Throughout the hearing, Michaelides expressed disappointment and bitterness over the escalating personal and professional attacks from the Attorney General, suggesting a vendetta against him. A 30-minute break was taken during the cross-examination, with further testimonies and statements planned. The Council will soon announce its decision regarding the admissibility of Michaelides' testimony concerning the anonymous complaint to the Anti-Corruption Authority.
The hearing continues to be a contentious and pivotal moment, reflecting broader issues of governance, integrity, and the independence of key public offices in Cyprus.
