Newsroom
Hungary has announced that it will withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC), marking a significant shift in its foreign policy. This decision comes shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is facing an ICC arrest warrant, visited Hungary. The Hungarian government, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, confirmed the withdrawal, stating that the ICC has become a "political court." The ICC had previously issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, accusing him of war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Hungary's departure from the ICC makes it the first European Union country to take such a step. Despite this, the withdrawal will not impact the ongoing legal proceedings of the court, which continues to function with the support of its 125 member states. Orban's move aligns with his broader stance on international institutions, often criticizing them for undermining national sovereignty.
Netanyahu, who has condemned the ICC's decision as "antisemitic," welcomed Hungary's bold stance, calling it a "moral" position. His government has consistently rejected the ICC's jurisdiction, especially regarding its claims over territories like the West Bank and Gaza, which Israel does not recognize as part of the court’s mandate. The ICC's ruling is part of a broader effort to hold those responsible for war crimes accountable, but it has faced significant resistance from countries like Israel and the U.S.
The withdrawal is seen as a symbolic gesture but raises questions about the future of international justice. While the U.S. and some other countries have been critical of the ICC, the court still has the backing of many nations around the world. The European Union, however, has expressed concern over Hungary's decision, with some calling it a setback for international criminal law.
The withdrawal will not take effect until a year after Hungary officially notifies the United Nations, but the political ramifications could set a precedent for other nations questioning the legitimacy of international legal bodies based on political alliances. As the debate continues, the ICC remains determined to uphold its mission of prosecuting those accused of the gravest international crimes.
*With information from the BBC
