The absence of accountability

The recent bout of inclement weather has brought to light a glaringly scandalous agreement between the government and a private entity. In this arrangement, the Ministry of Energy was leasing its warehouse to a private individual for €6,600 annually, who, in turn, subleased it to the Ministry of Health for a staggering €135,000 per year. Shockingly, authorities chose to extend the lease on the property for an additional 33 years without addressing the fundamental questions: Is the space suitable for pharmaceutical storage? Does this agreement truly serve the public interest? Had they undertaken a thorough review with the state's best interests in mind, and heeded the warnings of pharmaceutical experts, the destruction of medicines and doubts about their quality due to inadequate storage could have been avoided. Such governmental-private sector agreements are not unprecedented, where state-owned land is leased at nominal rates to select individuals who then profit by subleasing it to government agencies. However, the pharmaceutical warehouse scandal stands out for its egregiousness, exposing systemic flaws within the government that tolerate fiscal mismanagement and ineffectual oversight, ultimately jeopardizing public safety.

This scandal has also perpetuated a culture of unaccountability, exemplified by the dismissive response of Health Minister Michael Damianos, who unfortunately downplayed the magnitude of the financial losses incurred. His responsibility, however, was not to normalize fiscal irresponsibility but to take decisive action, investigate why warnings about unsuitable pharmaceutical depots were ignored, and ensure the integrity of medicines provided to the public. Instead, the state's response fosters a culture where petty corruption is tacitly accepted and demands for accountability are met with indifference.

In such an environment, where institutional oversight is lacking and major scandals are swept under the rug, a culture of unaccountability prevails. Meanwhile, bishops assume roles typically reserved for judicial authorities, and the Church embarks on unauthorized construction projects with impunity, backed by political elites.

Institutions that should serve as checks on power and guardians of the public interest are instead complicit in perpetuating systemic issues. In this climate, who can hold former presidents accountable? Who can restore trust in a justice system viewed with suspicion by society? The Attorney General's Office should play this role, yet George Savvidis awkwardly assures that conflicts will be resolved, emphasizing his close friendship with Nicos Anastasiades. Such friendships, openly flaunted, undermine public trust in institutions, which should serve the public interest and uphold the rule of law. Instead, they foster a culture of impunity and erode accountability.

[This article was translated from its Greek original and edited for brevity and clarity]