CLOSE
Loading...
23° Nicosia,
18 June, 2019
 
Home  /  Comment  /  Opinion

The Guterres Framework

In an era where the public can change allegiances based on one tweet, sincerity and integrity are greatly appreciated

Yiannis Kafkarides

Yiannis Kafkarides

Truth be told we are not masters in the art of diplomacy. Odd as it may sound modern diplomacy involves truthfulness, directness and openness. In an era where the public can change allegiances based on one tweet, sincerity and integrity are greatly appreciated. Cypriots however do excel in bargaining. In the process and if history is anything to go by, Cyprus is willing to ‘defect’ until the end of time, regrettably whatever the consequences.

Following the events that led to the collapse of the conference on Cyprus in Crans Montana President Anastasiades had announced that he is ready to restart the negotiations from where they left off, namely based on the 4th of July Guterres framework.

The announcement was met with disbelief as the Turkish Cypriots and some members of the Greek Cypriot negotiating team had no recollection of such a framework. A white paper dated June 30 2017 was the last documented list of principles of intent.

The debate escalated with each side squabbling as to the existence of a 4th of July document. The President went as far as asking UN envoy Jane Holl Lute to look for the minutes of the meeting in question, which in turn generated conspiracy theories as to the reason behind the disappearance of the minutes. It was later revealed that what the President had in mind was a message from UNSG Antonio Guterres that was reportedly transmitted to the two leaders by UN mediator Espen Barth Eide.

It must be said that the Guterres framework as it came to be known is not a set of agreed convergences but instead a statement of intent, a roadmap based on contemporary understanding of conflict resolution which is part of the methodology of UN mediation guidelines. Since both sides agreed to engage in UN led negotiations, the two sides in principle, agreed to discuss the proposals.

In detail, Anastasiades insisted on it because the phraseology was favourable. On the chapter of guarantees the June 30 white paper refers to the fact that the unilateral rights of intervention do not constitute a viable arrangement and must end. There is also a reference on the issue of troops which the paper notes should be dealt with at the highest political level, implying that decisions on the issue should be taken by the heads of government of Turkey, UK and Greece. On governance there was a specific reference to rotating Presidency, a convergence that had been achieved in the past by Chistofias-Talat.

The Guterres framework, ie. the UNs reading of the situation before any bargaining had begun, was more wholesome. According Anastasiades’s interpretation, the 4th of July framework spelled out that the Treaty of Guarantees between Cyprus, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom, which is part of the Treaty establishing the Republic of Cyprus, is not viable in its entirety and must be changed or abolished. The wording used by the President is also found in the June 30 paper as ''I think we need, as he said, the end of the unilateral right of intervention and the end of the Treaty of Guarantees''.  On this particular point rests, tactical confusion aside, the entire argument; regardless of which side one supports, it had become apparent to the parties involved that there cannot be a solution without abolishing intervention rights.

For Anastasiades this was a major achievement, albeit without getting the job done. It’s an argument that any Cypriot President will win (elections with).

It is however well known among observers that the chapter of guarantees is of symbolic nature. It is also generally expected that Turkey will relinquish its intervention rights in exchange for a deal that would secure more powers for Turkish Cypriots in the governance chapter. The July 4th conversations spoke of immediate withdrawal of armies from Cyprus allowing for a sunset clause for the withdrawal of the remaining forces. At the same time ''governance issues were to be dealt with based on the principle of effective participation’’.

In other words the bargaining involved the abolition of guarantees by Turkey in exchange for more concessions on governance by Greek Cypriots.

At this point, no one picked up the mic from the floor.

The complexity involved in drawing up in detail the powers of every single institution in a State and drafting the laws governing these is undoubtedly a daunting task. However most of the issues around chapters on property and territory had been written with black ink, very few details remained in red and blue.

Be that as it may Anastasiades decided that concessions on governance were shaping up to be too much for the Greek Cypriots. He feared that such a deal will not pass through a referendum.

Speaking to the press yesterday Anastasiades said that since the negotiations ended inconclusively any convergences are invalidated.

TAGS
Guterres  |  Anastasiades  |  Cyprus  |  Negotiations  |  Eide  |  Framework

Opinion: Latest Articles

Prudence and moderation

Prudence and moderation

Greece is going through one of the most toxic pre-election periods it has experienced in decades
Alexis Papachelas
 |  OPINION
President Anastasiades visiting Nicosia General Hospital on the 7th of June 2019 following the implementation of the General Healthcare System

Anastasiadescare

When it comes to policy making, politicians should be judged based on the results of their actions not their intentions
Yiannis Kafkarides
 |  OPINION
The silent vote

The silent vote

“It’s better if the result exceeds your expectations”
Alexis Papachelas
 |  OPINION
Marina Economides keeps things straight as politics of hope clash with populism and fear

They are not Europe

Hope will save the day, not populist rhetoric that flirts with racism and fear
Marina Economides
 |  OPINION
President Nikos Anastasiades shakes hands with Niyazi Kızılyürek on election day

Against all odds

Cyprus elects first ever Turkish Cypriot MEP, shuns nationalists
Yiannis Kafkarides
 |  OPINION
Eleni Xenou asks how much longer until anger over old politics turns rage into action

How much longer?

Old fashioned politics not up to task, but reaction has yet to boil over
Eleni Xenou
 |  OPINION
Andreas Paraschos writes about the overburdened voters as he sees trouble ahead on the Old Continent

Monnet or Orban?

Putting national power above the greater good for Europe spells out a bigger problem
Andreas Paraschos
 |  OPINION
Eleni Xenou sifts through the mud of dirty politics to see a cleaner picture ahead of European elections

Did someone say Europe?

Cheap shots in Cypriot politics rule the day as party leaders choose bickering over substance
Eleni Xenou
 |  OPINION
Andreas Paraschos connects the dots as multiple cases fail to deliver justice, one after the other

The yellow lake

Lady justice fails to prevail as politicians hop from one case to the next
Andreas Paraschos
 |  OPINION
Marina Economides is fed up with petty politics that do irreparable damage, Kızılyurek’s candidacy a case in point

Toxic environment

Short term memory loss strikes around election season, but at what cost?
Marina Economides
 |  OPINION
Eleni Xenou looks closely at the racist question and discovers hidden undertones

So are we racists?

Walls go up as the dreadful question about racism fails to hit a nerve
Eleni Xenou
 |  OPINION
Cry havoc!

Cry havoc!

The decision by the President to call the Turkish incursion into the Cyprus EEZ an invasion has raised eyebrows both at ...
Yiannis Kafkarides
 |  OPINION
Kathimerini Cyprus writes a letter of apology in the wake of the horrific serial killer murders

Sorry

An apology in the wake of the horrific serial killer murders
 |  OPINION
A tear for Notre Dame

A tear for Notre Dame

Andreas Paraschos writes about the wilderness of a society that does not seek accountability
Andreas Paraschos
 |  OPINION
X