Newsroom
UEFA is suddenly facing more than just match-day drama, it’s caught in a political storm. Swiss lawmakers are now questioning why Europe’s football boss hasn’t taken action against Israel, shining a spotlight on the organization’s tax-exempt status and its role in promoting peace through sport.
Next week, the parliament in Vaud, where UEFA is registered for tax purposes, will debate whether the federation still qualifies for its tax break. If the motion passes, the Swiss government could demand explanations from UEFA on why it hasn’t sanctioned Israel, despite pressure from activist groups like Game Over Israel, which wants Israel banned from UEFA competitions.
The vote isn’t a sure thing. Left-wing parties hold 64 of 150 seats, so the swing votes from the right could make or break the proposal. Meanwhile, insiders warn that losing the tax exemption could cost UEFA around €30 million a year and raise demands for more transparency over its €5 billion annual revenue.
The debate over Israel’s participation isn’t just talk. Officials already mulled a suspension during the Nations League draw in Brussels last month. But to actually kick Israel out, 20 of 21 members of UEFA’s Executive Committee would have to agree, with Israel naturally sitting out the vote. Some members are reportedly open to it, but nothing is guaranteed.
At the center of it all is UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin. As the only one who can formally put the issue to a vote, Ceferin faces a delicate balancing act, navigating a politically charged situation where football, international diplomacy, and big money collide.
